NAVIGATION BAR

  Welcome!
  Contact Us
  Helen's Journal

Sign Up
  New Content E-mail List




eStore

  Barley Products

  Bean Products

  Buckwheat Products

  Canning Supplies

  Corn Products

  Lentil Products

  Millet

  Nuts

  Oat Products

  Pea Products

  Pet Bedding

  Popcorn Kernels

  Rodent Pet Food

  Rice Products

  Rye Products

  Seed Products

  Sweeteners

  Soy Products

  Wheat Products





About
  The Aardsma Family
    The Dad
    The Mom
  Jennifer (Aardsma) Hall 
    Treasuring Home




Dr. Aardsma's
Educational Products

  Dr. Aardsma's Drills
  Dr. Aardsma's
Saxon Math Checker


FAQ
  Canning
  Shipping

         
     




Helen's Mulberry Lane Farm Journal




November 20, 2010.

Someone wrote to Gerald recently asking about the new body scanners at airports and if there are any radiation risks associated with them.

The Transportation and Security Act (TSA) now has full body scanners at 60 airports across the country causing quite a hub-bub in the news and online blogs, etc. Much misinformation abounds on this topic. Since Gerald has a Ph. D. in physics, (University of Toronto), he is in a good position to answer this question. I know many of you will be traveling by air this holiday season. Maybe it will answer some concerns you may have, as well.



When you get into this sort of topic, you are in the relative-risk category.

Everything we do, in this fallen world, has an associated health risk, which cannot be reduced to zero. (There are no utopias down here.) So all we can do is try to make choices which minimize our risk.

For example, if I go out in my car to buy groceries, there is a chance (small, but not zero) that I will get in a car accident and be killed. If I stay home and don't buy groceries, there is a larger risk that I will starve to death. So I take the smaller risk, without giving it much further thought. (Indeed, it isn't worthy of much further thought.) I know, from experience, that the risk is real but small. I judge the risk to be worth the benefit. I would judge differently if I didn't need to eat. Why risk a trip to the grocery store for nothing?

The same thing is going on with airport scanners. They, too have an associated health risk. But it is a very small risk --- probably significantly less than traffic accident injury. The general population has no feeling for this (i.e., they have virtually no real-life experience with radiation risk), so they have to rely on experts who have made it their business to learn the numbers on this. The experts tell us, pretty clearly, that health risk from these scanners is very small. They are right about this as far as objective scientific knowledge is concerned, and I can see no rational reason to doubt them. So I would personally not be in the least alarmed to be scanned by an airport scanner in preparation for a flight --- in the same sense in which I would not be in the least alarmed to hop in my car and go get groceries. Still, if I did not need to be scanned, I wouldn't.

I routinely avoid dental x-rays for myself and my family because there is a (small) cancer risk associated with all x-rays and I find that the dentist can, in fact, 99% of the time, do what needs to be done just fine without them.

Unfortunately, due to certain individuals wishing to blow up airplanes, we (American citizens) find the (very small) risk due to use of airport scanners to be unavoidable. So we use them, accepting the fact that their benefit significantly outweighs their risk.

Gerald





Happy Thanksgiving! Thank God for freedom in the good ol' USA!
Photo by Helen Aardsma, October , 2010.






More next time......

     


             Copyright ©1996-2021 Mulberry Lane Farm. All rights reserved;photos and content.